N.Z Herald Breaks the news that Tuipulotu’s First Drug Test was faulty

“A faulty positive drugs test” is what we are made to believe according to NZR mummy’s boy Patrick McKendry. 

READ  

McKendry must surely know something we don’t?  

So far we ‘the public’ have been fed there was ‘one positive’ and ‘one negative’. 

A hung jury.  

You walk free.  

As best I can grasp the Herald’s rugby (crime?) reporter is indicating the 1^st ‘positive’ test was in-fact  ‘faulty’ and the subsequent second ‘negative’ test was conducted correctly.

It reads this way.  

So Patrick please kindly show us the evidence that breaks open this case.  

The actual drug reports that collaborate this assertion?   

Starter for 10: tell us what the drugs that were allegedly found in the first test were?

Break the story. 

You clearly have the ‘inside oil’ and wouldn’t make shit up to cosy-up to rugby circles, eh?

All these reports of growing ‘fake news’ start making sense.